Does General Mills Use Animal Testing On Pet Food

Warning: This is a long postal service! I besides didnt think it was right to fill it with loads of images, but its full of useful information about large brands and the smaller companies they own!

When researching nigh the large brands which we have all heard of (Maybelline/Max Factor etc) I started to notice that a lot of them were owned past the aforementioned companies so I decided to take a await at the larger companies; the beneath two make maps shows which big companies own which brands and is what I based this enquiry on;

Map one;http://www.foodista.com/weblog/2013/04/02/a-nutrient-convergence-map-you-wished-yous-never-saw

Map two;http://popular-online.com/retail-nutrient-brand-map/

Merely from a brand point of view I was surprised at the corporeality of well known brands each of these companies own!! From hither I checked which big brands test their products, cosmetics, household and toiletries as well every bit food and so I could see which products I needed to steer clear of. This is just on the inquiry I have done;

The below companies all state that though they do not test on animals themselves, they committee or allow testing to happen on their products so that they can exist sold in countries such equally Mainland china where beast testing is required by police.

Note: I have listed all the sub-brands I could observe for both the UK, United states and all other brands where applicable. I have likewise highlighted the ones which I recognise, even so if I take missed any, misspelt them or missed whatever brands off my list please forgive me, I am going off of the websites stated beneath.

Unilever

Unilever Statement;

Unilever is committed to the emptying of animal testing. We are equally committed to consumer health and safety, and to the safety of our workforce and the environment. Nosotros practice not examination finished products on animals unless demanded by the regulatory government in the few countries where this is the police. In such cases, we try to convince the local regime to change the law. Where some testing of ingredients is required past law or currently unavoidable, nosotros aim to minimise the number of animals used.

In pursuit of these goals, Unilever on the ane paw applies strict internal control procedures to ensure that brute testing is only carried out when no alternatives are available and, on the other hand, invests in developing and applying alternative approaches to replace animal testing in safety assessments for consumer products.

Unilever does non undertake brute testing, or commission others to do testing on its behalf, unless it is necessary to come across its wellness, rubber and environmental obligations or it is demanded past government regulators or other official bodies.

When developing these products, for ethical reasons it is not always possible to carry out tests directly on humans. Therefore, novel ingredients may have to be tested on animals start. Brute studies may need to exist performed to establish the mechanism of activeness underpinning the wellness benefits of these ingredients also as to assess their condom.

For their full argument on animal testing please click here; http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living-2014/our-approach-to-sustainability/responding-to-stakeholder-concerns/developing-alternative-approaches-to-animal-testing/

Unilever country that they test on animals when required past police, again so they can sell their products in countries such every bit Mainland china but they as well land they test their ingredients on animal reasons when it's a 'novel' ingredient. I haven't put their full statement here every bit it is very long, so I encourage readers to await at their website as cited.

Unilever has likewise been reported on for doing farthermost, cruel and unnecessary tests on animals for their benefit. Though they say they want to minimize animal testing, Unilever has come up numerous times in my research as one of the worse brands out there for testing on animals and for not keeping suffering to a minimal.

The combination of them letting their products be tested to allow them college profits, the fact that they state they test new products on animals and the other sources that state the cruelty they inflict on animals means I absolutely reject to touch a single matter fabricated by them and will never purchase anything from the brands they own.

Unilever is, amoung others, known to be one of the worse companies for animal testing, and because they own then many brands and sell so many products, thousands of products in fact are released every year, the amount of products tested on animals in extreme and cruel ways is simply staggering.

Unilever owns Bovil, I can't believe its non Butter, Marmite, Pot Noodle, Lynx, Walls, Comfort, Dove, Elmlea, Vaseline, Brylcreem, Impulse, Persil, Brut, Ben and Jerrys, HB, Timotei, Cornetto, Peperami, Simple, Magnum, Lipton, Domestos,Viennetta, Tresemme, PG Tips, Colmans, Cif, Stork, Knorr, Solero, Certain, Carte D'Or, Surf, St Ives, V05, Lyons, Ponds, Maille, Slim.Fast, Radox, Bertolli, Flora and Hellmans.

http://www.unilever.co.uk/brands-in-action/view-brands.aspx

http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living-2014/our-approach-to-sustainability/responding-to-stakeholder-concerns/developing-alternative-approaches-to-animal-testing/

http://www.express.co.great britain/news/world/409256/Food-giants-accused-of-cruel-and-sickening-experiments-in-fauna-testing-scandal

http://world wide web.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2345276/Food-giants-Nestle-Unilever-caught-animate being-testing-scandal.html

Nestle

A Nestle Q and A on Animate being Testing from their website;

1. Does Nestlé routinely test its products on animals?
2. We do not utilize animal testing to develop conventional foods and drinks such as coffee, tea, cereal and chocolate.
3. Are yous ever required to test new products or ingredients on animals?
4. On very rare occasions, yeah. National authorities crave new food products and ingredients to be rubber for man consumption, and in certain cases it is necessary to carry out animal tests to demonstrate this. Nosotros tin can assure you that we employ beast testing as little as possible, and that our care of animals always complies with the highest standards. Beast testing should only take place where absolutely necessary, equally office of the regulatory process to commercialise a product, or as office of the development of novel food products, such as those with healthcare benefits.
5. Why is animal testing necessary?
6. Beast studies are critically important to make advances in fundamental nutrition and health science.

This research helps to provide the scientific basis for developing novel ingredients, or new nutritional strategies for improving health. This includes medical foods that help people with acute and chronic medical conditions

1. What is your approach to animal testing?
2. Where creature testing is necessary, information technology is vital that we are fully enlightened of, and our actions are guided by, our ethical responsibility for the welfare of animals. This includes proper housing, nutrition, care and humane handling.

Whatever awarding for creature testing must be submitted to our internal ethics commission for approval, prior to its submission to the relevant authorities.

We make sure that all our employees who look afterwards animals in our research facilities are trained in the care of animals in research, to ensure absolute competency and awareness of the ethical issues involved. We proceed abreast of new advances in animal testing, as well as alternatives to animal testing.

When carrying out brute studies, we apply the internationally recognised 'Triple R' and the relevant fauna welfare principles to ensure that any tests are only used where necessary and that animals are cared for to the highest standards.

http://www.nestle.com/aboutus/ask-nestle/answers/do-you-test-your-products-on-animals

Animate being testing, in my opinion is not at all necessary for food, cosmetics, toiletries or household and Nestle state they do examination on animals for more than than just selling their products in Prc. To me, this makes them one of the worse brands out there. Not simply that, forth with Unilever they are one of the companies that regularly gets reported on for doing unnecessary tests on animals which are savage and cause extreme suffering. I will never buying anything from Nestle or the brands they ain.

Added to this, Nestles smaller company L'Oreal is known to be one of the worst for animal testing, I'll be posting about L'Oreal and all things wrong with it in a few weeks and so please keep an heart out for that, but know that whatsoever of the companies they own or products they make are tested on animals.

Nestle own Aero, Bakers Complete, Beneful, Boost, Buitoni, Butterfinger, Cailler Chocolate, Carnation Evaporated Milk, Cerelac Cereal, Chef, Chef-Mate, Chocapic Cereal, Cini Minis Cereal, Coffee-Mate, Crunch, DiGiorno Frozen Pizza, Dreyers Ice Cream, Estrekitas Cereal, Extreme Ice Foam, Felix, Fitness Cereal, Friskies, Gerber Baby Nutrient, Gourmet Cat Food, Herta, Hot Pockets, Jacks Pizza, KitKat, La Laitiere Desserts, Lean Cuisine, Maggi, Milo Beverages, Minor'southward, Movenpick Ice Foam, NaturNes Infant Food, Nescafe, Nespresso, Nesquik, Nestea, Nestle Ice Foam, Nestle Pure Life Water, Nestum Cereal, Nido Baby Products, Nutren Junior, Optifast, Orion Chocolate, Peptamen, Perrier, Poland Spring, Purina, Resource, South. Pellegrino, Sjora, Smarties, Stouffers, Thomy Mustard, Toll House, Tombstone Pizza and Wonka.

http://www.nestle.com/brands/brandssearchlist?char=A

http://world wide web.limited.co.u.k./news/earth/409256/Food-giants-defendant-of-cruel-and-sickening-experiments-in-animal-testing-scandal

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/commodity-2345276/Food-giants-Nestle-Unilever-caught-creature-testing-scandal.html

http://www.nesteacrueltea.com/ActNow.aspx

Mars

Mars Argument

I couldn't notice a statement from Mars about their beast testing, even so I believe that they exercise test due to the information plant on the below sites;

Delight be warned this is a video and looks to be extremely graphic

http://world wide web.peta.org/videos/mars-ghoulish-secret-candy-maker-kills-animals/ =

http://world wide web.marscandykills.com/

Too, it has been in the news in the terminal few months that a number of dogs have died through eating Pedigree, though it remains unsustained.

http://www.naturalnews.com/041694_Pedigree_dog_food_pet_deaths_customer_complaints.html

http://www.hoax-slayer.com/pedigree-dry-dog-food-alert.shtml

Mars owns Aquarian, Catsan, Ceasar, Chappie, Dreamies, Kitekat, Misfits, Pedigree, Sheba, Whiskas, Bounty, Celebrations, Flyte, Galaxy, M&Ms(all variations), Maltesers, Mars (all variations), Milky way, Revels, Snickers, Topic, Tracker, Twix, Dolmio, Seeds of Change, Uncle Bens, Wrigleys, Airwaves, Altoids, Doublemint, Wrigleys Extra, Hubba Bubba, Juicy Fruit, Lockets, Orbit, Skittles, Starburst, Tunes, Spearmint, Alterra Coffee, the Bright Tea Company, Flavia, Klix, Banfield Pet Hospital, Califonia Natural, Evo, Eukanuba (excluding Europe), Greenies, Iams (excluding Europe), Innova, Nutro, Majestic Canin, the Goodlife Recipe, Temptations, Wisdom Panel, three Musketeers, American Heritage, Amicelli, Balisto, Combos, Dove Chocolate, Ethel G Chocolate, goodness knows, Kudos, marathon, Pure Dark, Ebly, KanTong, MasterFoods, Miracoli, Pamesello, Raris, Royco, Suziwan, Large Red, Eclipse, Freedent, Lifesavers, Winterfresh and CocoaVIa.

http://www.mars.com/global/brands.aspx

http://www.mars.com/great britain/en/brands.aspx

Proctor and Gamble

Proctor and Hazard Statement

At Procter & Gamble we believe the elimination of brute testing is the right thing to practise. P&Yard does not test its products or ingredients on animals anywhere in the earth, unless required by police. We will proceed to develop not-beast alternative tests and work with regulators around the world to ultimately terminate testing involving animals. We have developed over 50 alternative, not-fauna testing methods and invested more $370 one thousand thousand in finding alternatives. We piece of work with leading independent and industry experts in the field of alternatives research, and nosotros partner with leading beast protection groups, such as the Humane Gild of the United states, to promote alternative inquiry methods and regulatory acceptance of alternatives.

For further information about their efforts with animal testing become to http://www.pg.com/en_US/sustainability/policies_practices/animal_welfare.shtml

From this we can run into that Proctor and Adventure allows testing on animals to sell their products in China and other such countries which has dissimilar laws about animate being testing. For me, I don't want to support a company that allows animal suffering simply for profits so I will not exist buying anything from Proctor and Gamble or their brands.

Iams is also well known to test on animals as well and these animals suffer extremely cruel conditions.

http://www.uncaged.co.uk/iamsexpress.htm

http://www.askavetquestion.com/iams.php

Proctor and Hazard own Always, Boss Skincare and Fragrances, Dolce and Gabbana Fragrances and brand up, Fixodent, Gucci Fragrances, Lacoste Fragrances, Noxzema, Pantene, Silvikin, System Professional person (Wella), Aussie, Fusion ProGlide, Head and Shoulders, Mach3, Olay, Perfect x, SK-xi, Venus, Avril Lavigne Frangrances, Braun, Dunhill Frangrances, Gillette, Iams (Europe),Herbal Essences, Max Factor, Old Spice, Rochas Frangrances, Tampax, Wash and Get, Christina Aguilera Fragrances, Escada Fragrances, Hugo Frangrances, nice 'northward easy, Oral-B, Sassoon (Wella) ,Sebastian Professional person, Wella, Ace, Bold, Duracell, Fairy, Iams, Regulan, Ambi Pur, Clearblue, Eukanuba, Febreze, Pampers, Viakal, Ariel, Daz, Flash,Pepto-Bismol, Vicks, Dreft, Lenor and Vortex.

http://www.pg.com/en_UK/brands.shtml

http://www.peta.org/about-peta/faq/i-thought-that-procter-and-gamble-had-stopped-animal-tests-why-is-it-nonetheless-included-on-the-practice-test-list/

Johnson and Johnson

Johnson and Johnsons Statement;

At Johnson & Johnson, it is our policy is to minimize the utilize of animals in laboratory research when assessing the safety and efficacy of our products. Since 2000, the employ of animals in our inquiry has decreased over 60 pct, relative to R&D investment.

Withal, the use of animals in the evolution of our products is sometimes required to ensure products are condom and effective. In fact, alternatives to animal testing techniques, usually called in vitro techniques, do not generate all of the pre-clinical data required by regime agencies to bring new products to market. Therefore, health care companies must combine in vitro tests with beast (in vivo) research to fulfill our scientific, legal and ethical obligations to provide safety and effective products.

Animals are only used for clinical pedagogy and grooming purposes when bodily participation by the trainee is required to learn a medical or surgical process (including proper product usage) where alternative models have been accounted inadequate for the purpose. Thus, at times, it becomes necessary for our businesses to utilize animals for didactics or demonstration. This is peculiarly true for certain products from our medical devices businesses, as proper training of the health professionals who will employ them is disquisitional to patient condom and the currently available non-fauna methods for training do not meet the necessarily loftier standards to ensure safe and proper use of these products. We continuously strive to review training requirements to determine if boosted reductions in beast apply can exist institute.

For our personal intendance products, nosotros do not carry beast testing or ask others to test on our behalf, except when required by police, and nosotros comply with requirements of the European Union (EU) ban on animal testing for cosmetics.

When animal testing is necessary, it is our policy to use animals from approved sources just, preferably purpose-bred animals which are born and raised under controlled conditions and specifically for testing.  In certain geographic regions of the world, purpose-bred animals are not available and, in these cases, animals must exist obtained through regulated dealers that meet our criteria for the humane care and utilize of laboratory inquiry animals.

For their total statement please go to; http://www.jnj.com/caring/citizenship-sustainability/strategic-framework/fauna-testing

It appears from this statement that Johnson and Johnson use animal testing extensively in their testing of products also every bit allowing further animal testing and then their products tin be sold in countries such as China. Johnson and Johnson practise ain a number of medical brands and utilise brute testing for medical research as well as toiletries so some of their brute testing would go towards the medicines they produce likewise as their other products.

Evidently some of their beneath brands are more difficult to avoid than other companies, such as the prescriptions, however I will not be ownership their brands because they allow their not-medical products to be tested on animals so they tin be sold in other countries. Whilst I volition non comment on their animal testing for medical reasons, I disagree with their testing for bigger profits (selling in countries with different laws), then I will not buy their products and will endeavor to use dissimilar medicine than what they produce purely for the corrective testing equally I practise non want to back up them in any style.

Brands that Johnson and Johnson besides are Johnsons, Babe.com, Destin, Natusan, Babycenter.com, Penaten, Prim'historic period, Bebe, Make clean & Articulate, Roc, Vendome, Neutrogena, pare ID, Rogaine, Aveeno, Lubriderm, Piz Buin, Rough-and-tumble, Bengay, Savlon, Neosporin, Cortaid, Daktarin, Compeed, Tucks, Listerine, Rembrandt, Tylenol, Sudafed, Pepcid, Nicorette, Motrin, Imodium, Dolormin, Benadryl, Mylanta, Zyrtec, Splenda, Benecol, Lactaid, Visine and Acuvue.

Johnson and Johnson as well own medical devices/products such every bit DePut Synthes/Synthes, Cordis, Biosense Webster. Inc, Codman Neuro, Lifescan. Inc, Animas Corporation, Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics. Inc, Janssen Diagnostics BVBA, Vistakon, Ethicon, Mentor, Advanced Sterilization Products and Acclarent.

Finally, they too own percriptions scuch equally Axert, Invega, Reminyl, Topamax, Concerta, Invega Sustenna, Risperdal, Leustatin, Duragesic, Nucynta, Risperdal Consta, Zarelto, Natrecor, Reopro, Simponi, Stelara, Remicade, Edurant, Intelence, Zytiga, Levaquin, Doribax, Prezista, Doxil, Sirturo, Procrit, Invokana, Velcade and Olysio.

http://www.jnj.com/healthcare-products/consumer

http://world wide web.jnj.com/healthcare-products/medical-technologies

http://www.jnj.com/healthcare-products/prescription

Mondelez International (Previously known as Kraft)

I couldn't notice an official statement from Mondelez themselves, even so I did find this on the below website;

In November 2014 Ethical Consumer viewed Mondelez International'due south completed questionnaire. In response to a question on creature testing the visitor stated: "We assure the safety and nutritional benefits of our ingredients, additives and products through a variety of research methods. We do non perform fauna testing for the vast majority of our products. Wherever possible, we avoid animal testing. In some limited cases, in that location are no practical alternatives to animate being testing, and we use outside facilities to do the testing. We work only with facilities that meet or exceed skillful laboratory practices and comply with all applicable laws and regulations on the employ of animals in research. We are committed to reducing the need for animal testing while maintaining our strict quality and safety standards."

http://world wide web.ethicalconsumer.org/companystories.aspx?CompanyId=57922&CategoryId=207

Mondelez state in this that they use animal testing for their products, even so they do non state what they use it for; government laws, production testing or inquiry, and though they state they use facilities that have 'skilful laboratory practices', in reality there is no way to perform animal testing without inflicting suffering on the animals. Looking at the brands they ain, I see no need for animal testing to occur, and considering the terrible and invasive tests that other food companies have washed, it concerns me that they employ animal testing for their products when I feel for what they are doing it is completely unnecessary. The fact that they practise not have a policy, or at to the lowest degree an hands found policy, on animal testing but there is this argument from them from simply a couple of months ago  which is and then vague on what they practise and why means that I will be regarding their testing on the same level as other companies that examination their products. I volition not be buying any of their products or their sub-brands (though it might hurting me to give up my beloved Oreos!).

Mondelez International own Kraft products besides as Alpen Gold, Barni, belVita, Bournvita, Bubbaloo, Cadbury (and all Cadbury sub-brands), Fries Ahoy!, Clight, Lodge Social, Cote d'Or, Dentyne, Dirol, Freia, Gevalia, M Mere, Halls, Hollywood, Beloved Maid, Jacobs, Kenco, Lacta, LU, Marabou, Mikado, Milka, Nabisco, Newtons, Nilla, Nutter Butter, Philadelphia, Oreo, Premium, Prince, Ritz, Royal, Sottilette, Sour Patch Kids, Stimorol, Stride, Tang, Tassimo, Tiger, Toblerone, Trakinas, Trident, Triscuit, Tuc and Wheat Thins.

http://www.mondelezinternational.com/brand-family unit

Coca Cola

Coca-Cola Statement

The Coca‑Cola Visitor does not conduct any animal tests and we do not direct fund whatever animate being testing of our drinks. Where government agencies require beast tests to demonstrate ingredient safety, nosotros rely on 3rd-party testing. We have shared our business regarding the upstanding and humane treatment of animals with our suppliers and others in the industry. We encourage the employ of alternative testing methods whenever and wherever possible and have financially supported inquiry to develop these alternative methods.

This statement shows once more that companies are willing to employ animal testing if it means higher profits; Coca-Cola use animal testing to prove their products are safe for homo consumption though many of their products accept been on the market for years.

I have also found through my research on Coca-Cola that they have performed some highly questionable and extremely invasive tests to show their production are safe. These tests were non required past law and were invasive, painful procedures which were deadly merely to examination the taste of products. I think this is completely unnecessary and cruel, yet they have now stopped these tests, though they yet adhere to their above policy for government testing in other countries.

I strongly disagree with the cruel tests they previously did, and the fact that they permit beast testing on their products just to sell them in other countries to get more profits means I don't want to back up them equally a company. This will be a difficult i as Coca-Cola is everywhere and is generally an easy choice to make when out but I will be endeavoring to stop buying from them and if I am dying for a cold coke, to only have own brand products.

Coca-Cola besides own A & Westward (all variations), Ades, Adina (all variations), Agua de Taxco, Al Waha, Ali, Almdudler(all variations), Alpina, Ambasa, Ameyal, Amorino, Andina, Apollnaris, Aquabona, Aquapure, Aquarius, Aquavalue, Arwa, Ayataka, Aybal-Kin, Bacardi, Bankia, Barbican, Bargs, Barqs (all variations), Barrilios, Bombardment, Bbaeonal Su, Bebere, Benedictino, Beverly, Bevi, Bibo, Bimbo, Birds Nest, Bistra, Bistrone, Biting Rosso, Bjaare, BlackFire, BlaK, Boga, Bolsi, Bonaqua, Bong Pyoung, Botaniq 1QQ, Botany, BPM, Brazzi, Vivid and Early on, Brisa, Bu, Burbulinadas, fire, Buyulu, Calpis, Calypso, Campbells, Canada Dry (all variations), Cannings, Cantarina, Cappy, Caprice, Carioca, Carlsberg, Carlysle Subcontract, Cascade, Cascal, Cepita, Cham, Chaon, Chaqwa, Charrua, Chaudfontaine (all variations), Thanks, Chinotto(all variations), Chippewa, Knightly, Ciel, Ciel Aquarious, Ciel Mini, Citra, Club, Coca Cola (all variations), Coco Palm, Cocoteen, Cocoteen Zeitaku, Coke Studio (all variations), Combi, Land Club, Creamy, Cresta, Cristal, Cristal Source, Crush (all variations), Crushed, Crusta, Crystal, Cumberland Group, D'Oro, DA, Damia, Damia Minera, DANNON, DA SANI, Del Prado, Del Valle (all variations), Delaware Punch, Disney Xtreme Coolers, Do Yous Have, Dobriy Dogaden (all variations), Dorna, Dr Pepper (all variations), E2, Viii O Clock (all variations), Epika, Escuis, Estrella Azul, Eva, Evian, Excellade, Fakher, Fanta (all variations), Far Coast, Felicia, Finley, Fioravanti, Five Live, Flavor Rage, Florida 7, Fonte Ijui, Frazer & Neave, Fresca (all variations), Frescolita, Freskyta (all variations), Frestea, Friolin, Frisco, Frugos (all variations), Fruitia, Fruitopia, Fruktime, Frutier, Frutsi, Full Throttle, FUZE, Fuze Tea (all variations), Geau Vitaminwater, Georgia (all variations), Glaceau (all variations), Gladiator, Aureate Top, Gold Spot, Golden Beat out, Golden Drop, Good Morning, Goombay, Goongbi (all variations), Gosohan (all variations), Goulburn (all variations), Guarana (all variations), Gwailchon (all variations), HSOK, Haitai, Hajime, Hangguang Local Buffet, Hani, Hatidar, Hawai, Healthworks, Heppinger, Hi Spot, Hi-C, hit, Honest (all variations), Hot Point, Huang, I Lohas, Ice Dew (all variations), Illy, Inca Kola (all variations), Innocent, Izvorul Alb, Coffee Monster, Jaz Cola, Jericho, Jet Tonic, Jolly Juice, Joy, Joya, Ju-C, Juan Valdez, But Juice, Kamjiki, Kani, Kapo, Karadamehuricha, Karadem, Keri, Keunkin,  Kia Ora (all variations), Kildevaeld, Kilimanjaro, Kin, Kinley (all variations), Kist, Kiwi Bluish, Kochakaden, Kolda Inglesa, Krest, Kristal, Kropla Beskidu, Krushka & Bochka, Krystal, Kuat (all variations), Kuli, La Jolla, La Vuelta, Lacti Deli, Lanitis (all variations), Leao (all variations), Less is More, Lezz, Lift (all variations), Lilia, Lilt (all variations), Limca, Limelite, Limonade, Linnuse, Lion, Maaza, Mado, Magdalenen Brunnen, Magic Summertime, Malvern, Manantial, Marocha, Master Arctic, Master Pour (all variations), Mate Tea, Matte Leao (all variations), Matusov Pramen, Mazoe, McCafe, McFruit, Mega Monster, Mello (all variations), Melonec, Mer, Mezzo Mix (all variations), Miami (all variations), Mickey Mouse, Migoro-Nomigoro, Mineragua, Minute Maid (all variations), Mireille, Momegeoun, Mone, Monster, Mori No Mizudayori, Mother, Moya Semya, Mutivita, Mundet, Zippo, Nagomi, Nalu, Namthip, Naturaqua (all variations), Natures Own,NESTEA (all variations), Nestle, Nevada, Neverfail, Side by side (all variations), Nico Biotime, Nordic Mist Northen Neck (all variations), NOS, Oasis (all variations), Odwalla, Olimpija, Olo Olo, Orchy, Pampa, Pandori, Peace Tea, Pearona, Peats Ridge, Pepe Rico, Peranec, Pibb,(all variations), Piko (all variations), Pilskalna, Play, Poiana Negri, Polar, PoljakPoljak, Poms, Popular, Portello, POWERADE (all variations), Powerplay, Premio, Presta Light, Prisco, Private Characterization (all variations), Pulp, Pump, Pumped, Pura Sol, Pure Jump, Pyungchangsoo, Qoo, Quatro (all variations), Quwat Jabel, Ramlosa, Rani, Real (all variations), Red Flash, Relentless, Rich, Rimzim, Rio!, Ripe N Ready, Riwa, Roemerquelle, Romerquelle, Rosa, Roses, Purple Tru, Safia, Samurai, San Luis, Santa Clara, Sarsi, Saryusaisai, Schurwald, Schuss, Schweppes (all variations), Seagrams, Awareness, Sensun, Senzao, Shandy, Shangri-La, Sidral (all variations), Sierra Azul, Simba, Only, Smart, Sobo, Sodenthaler (all variations), Sokenbicha, Solaria, Solo, Sonfil, Southern Sun, Sparkle, Sparletta (all variations), Splash, Sport (all variations), Leap H2o, Jump!, Sprite (all variations), Spur, Squirt, Stoney Ginger Beer (all variations), Su Voce, Saccharide Gratuitous (all variations), Sunfill, Sunfrut (all variations), Sunnt-10, Surge, Svali, Sveva, TaB (all variations), Tai (all variations), Taiyo no Mate Cha, Ten Ren, The Spirit of Geogrgia, Thextons, This Water, Thums Upwards, Tian Yu Di, Tiky, Toka, Acme, Topo Chico, Toppur, Tops, Toscal, Tropi (all variations), Tropical, Tuborg (all variations), Ultra, Urbacher, Urge, Valle (all variations), Valpre, Valser (all variations), Vaquita, VAULT (all variations), Vegibeta, Victoria, Vilas Del Turbon, Vio, Vita Slim, Vital (all variations), Vitingo, Vittalev, Viva, Wildberry, Wilkins, Worx Energy, Yamgguang (all variations), Yarylo Kvass, Yasly Sad, Yo Conozco a Hugo, Yoli, Youki, Yuan Ye (all variations) and Zico.

(PHEW!! Y'all accept no thought how long that all took to type out!)

To see the brands per region of the earth go onto the lesser link.

http://www.coca-cola.co.united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland/faq/environment/does-coca-cola-exam-on-animals.html

http://world wide web.peta.org/weblog/cocacola-stops-animal-tests/

http://www.peta.org/about-peta/victories/drinkable-leader-coca-cola-drops-fauna-tests/

http://www.coca-colacompany.com/brands/all/

PepsiCo

PepsiCo Statement

PepsiCo does not conduct whatsoever creature tests and does not straight fund any animal tests on its beverages and foods. Where governmental agencies crave animate being tests to demonstrate ingredient safety, companies using those ingredients rely on third political party testing.

PepsiCo has shared our concern regarding the ethical and humane treatment of animals with our suppliers and others in the industry. We encourage the use of alternative testing methods whenever and wherever possible and have financially supported inquiry to develop these alternative methods.

As with most of the other companies out at that place, PepsiCo allows their products to be tested on animals so they tin can be sold in more places. They also appear to take funded a number of projects for which the purpose is unclear. Again, I volition not be buying PepsiCo products as they allow beast testing on their products so they can exist sold in countries such every bit China.

PepsiCo besides ain Walkers, Doritos, Quaker Oats, Scotts Porridge Oats, Tropicana, Pepsi, 7Up, Gatorade, Copella, Sobe V Water, Snack a Jacks, Mountain Dew, Naked Juice and Nobbys Basics.

http://www.pepsico.com/company/policies

http://www.peta.org/web log/pepsico-stops-brute-tests/

http://www.sourcewatch.org/alphabetize.php/PepsiCo

http://world wide web.pepsico.co.united kingdom/brands

This website applies to Coca-Cola and PepsiCo.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/31/business organization/31testing-web.html?_r=0

Associated British Foods PLC

Associated British Foods Statement

We avoid the apply of animate being testing wherever possible. In each of the markets where we are active we comply with all relevant laws and only utilize animals for research where it is a legal requirement.

This company also allows beast testing when certain countries laws insist. Every bit with the others, I volition not be buying from them or their other businesses/brands.

Associated British Foods besides ain Allison, Argo, Askeys, Baking Mad, Billingtons, Blue Dragon, Burgen, Capullo, Crusha, Don, Durkee, Jacksons of Piccadilly, Jordans, Karo, Kingsmill, KR Castlemaine, La Tisaniere, Mazola, Ovaltine, Patak'south, Ryvita, Silver Spoon, Speedibake, Spice Islands, Sunblest, Tip Top, Tone'southward and Twinings.

Businesses they ain are AB Carbohydrate, AB Agri, AB World Foods, ACH, Allied Bakeries, Centrolineal Mills, George Weston Foods, Westmill Foods and Primark.

http://www.abf.co.u.k./tools/header/faqs

http://www.abf.co.u.k./about_us/our_group/our_grocery_brands

General Mills

General Mills Argument on Fauna Testing

It has long been General Mills' policy to restrict and/or minimize the testing of food products and food ingredients on animals other than humans. Equally a event, the vast majority of our products do not incorporate testing of whatever kind on animals, other than humans, and we practice non conduct research on animals, other than humans, in company laboratories.

To run across their full argument, including brute welfare in regards to pork, milk, eggs and antibiotics please get to the below website:

http://www.generalmills.com/en/News/Issues/animal-welfare-policy

I couldn't find whatever websites stating that General Mills do utilise animal testing, nor could I find any campaigns against them then I assume that the argument they say hither is correct and the use fiddling or no animal testing for their products.

This means (there is one of the big ones that don't test yay!) that I volition continue to use General Mills products unless new evidence comes to calorie-free or unless the production goes against whatever of my other standpoints i.east. use of palm oil.

The but notation about these is I believe Cheerios etc are sold through Nestle…

General Mills own Betty Crocker, Bisquick, Gilt Medal, Immaculate Baking, Jus-Rol, Knack & Back, La Saltena, Pillsbury (all variations), Yoki, Large G Cereal, Cascadian Farm, Cheerios, Chex, Cinnamon Toast Crunch, Fiber I, Kix, Lucky Charms, Monsters east.g Count Chocula, Total, Trix,Wheaties, Haagen Daz, Annies, Diablitos Underwood, Light-green Giant, Helper, Onetime El Paso, V.Pearl, Wanchai Ferry, Nutrient Should Taste Adept, Larabar, Muir Glen, Frescarini, Latina, Totinos/Jenos, Bugles, Fruit Snacks, Gardetto's, Nature Valley, Progresso, Parampara, Liberte, Mountain Loftier and Yoplait (all variations).

http://www.generalmills.com/en/Brands/Overview

Kelloggs

Kelloggs Argument

Kellogg does not use animal testing in Europe.

That is literally their unabridged statement. (?!)

http://pressoffice.kelloggs.co.great britain/index.php?s=20287&item=29952

I found piffling other sources which say Kellogs do examination however, it must be remembered that Kellogs did extensive testing on animals, pregnant women, children and babies at the turn of century well up until the 50s or 60s.

Kelloggs also ainAll-Bran, Apple Jacks, Cinnabon,  Corn Pops,Corn Flakes, Cracklin' Oat Bran, Crispix, Crunchmania,Coco Pops, Country Shop, Crunchy Nut, Eggo, Fiber Plus, Frosted Flakes, Fruit 'n Fibre, Froot Loops, Frosties, Frosted Mini-Wheats, Fruit Flavoured Snacks, Honey Smacks, Honey Loops, Honey Pops, Just Right, Krave, Depression Fat Granola,Mueslix, Nutri-Grain, Pop Tarts, Premium Fruit Muesli, Raisin Bran, Rice Krispies, Ricicles, Special K, Start, To Go, Wheats and Winders.

http://www.kelloggs.co.u.k./en_GB/production-search.pt-*.html

http://www.kelloggs.com/en_US/production-search.pt-*.html

Danone, Yakult, Unilever and Nestle

The below article from the BUAV applies to Danone, Yakult, Unilever and Nestle, and for me is evidence enough never to purchase their products. The experiments these animals were subjected to were cruel, unnecessary and completely wrong equally I believe the serve no existent purpose and inflicted incredible amounts of pain on the animals earlier they were killed and dissected, for food products! Considering of this article solitary I wouldn't buy from these brands but combining it with the other research I've done but appalls me at what companies do to defenseless animals for reasons that just make no sense.

http://www.buav.org/article/1292/buav-condemns-roughshod-animal-experiments-past-major-food-companies-to-prove-%E2%fourscore%98health-benefits%E2%80%99

---

I know that for many people, boycotting these companies would be very difficult, forth with the cosmetic companies I am besides avoiding (Please see my before post on the truth of cosmetics) and already it is putting limitations on my nutrition and making me think twice virtually any product I purchase, but I retrieve it is a expert affair. The limitations on food and drinkable volition be good for my diet and should help me to become healthier, but more importantly than that information technology means I wont be supporting companies that either practice or allow fauna testing on their products which for me is the about important thing. I decline to back up a company that inflicts in whatever manner animal suffering, and knowing the pain these animals go through…I call up I tin skip a couple of biscuits!

If you retrieve I am wrong on any of these, or that the information is out of date please do go far touch! I'd love to meet other sources of information to add together to this.

For the animals ten

Source: https://crueltyfreeblog.wordpress.com/tag/general-mills/

Posted by: mckinleywriney.blogspot.com

Share this post